Quote:Yeah, no problem, I just wanted to clear up any confusion that might have arisen from potential responses/ scenarios that might have included those picks. 

 

 

As for my dream scenario's....its still to have Clowney make it to our pick, and then trade down to 6 with Atlanta, and recoup their 2nd + 4th rounder for 2014. Atlanta's motivation being Clowney. 

 

Then while sitting at 6, trade down again with Detroit, recoup their 2nd + 4th rounders as well. Detroit's motivation being Sammy Watkins. 

 

If in either of these scenario's the Jags could squeeze a 2015 first rounder instead of the 2014 second rounder (usually the transfer is when trading future year picks, they go up one round per year of trading, thus the 2nd rounders in 2014, become 2015 first rounders), then by all means, do it. 

 

 

Then at 10, the Jags would likely still have their pick of a number of great prospects like Barr, Evans, Ebron, or Gilbert. 

 

Or, they could even trade back some more and recoup a few more 2nd or 3rd rounders. 

 

I'd say just make sure you don't trade back too much to where you aren't getting a top notch guy with the first rounder for this year. 

 

TMD, before I answer this, I edited my post above.

 

As for this line in bold, that's the conundrum for me.

 

If Clowney is on the board, he would seem to represent the best opportunity for a stud, impact player at 3.  However, he would seem to be the one pick that would drive demand for that pick, which would give us more in trade down.

 

I think even though this is a deep draft and the team needs a lot of help, I would be reluctant to deal down if Clowney is on the board.

---