Quote:I agree with this completely.

 

Only problem is the viability of the proposal.

 

If you were the Browns and you had a Pro Bowl C in his prime on the roster, would you trade him away for a 4th and a 5th?

 

Yes, Monroe played LT, but he wasn't a Pro Bowler, either.  Stroud-a pro bowl defensive lineman-was traded to Buffalo and netted a 3rd and a 4th, IIRC.

 

Were this a straight up trade, I don't think Cleveland would make that deal, which is why, while the idea of sending picks to them as an inducement to not match the offer is a good one, I don't think it would be enough.  I think a 3rd rd pick might do the trick, but a 4th and 5th?  No.

If they don't deal him, they will have to pay him 10 mil this year then let him walk next year and receive nothing.

 

He's a free agent so it's not like they need compensation for money invested in his contract. We would be financially responsible for the entire contract.

 

If a 4th and 5th weren't enough for Cleveland to release a player this year that doesn't want to be there, then I would just keep my draft picks and and consider him an option next year.

 

Cleveland really doesn't have a lot of leverage. As long as Mack sticks to his guns, they will eventually have to make a decision that is best for them long term and that will probably have to happen before the draft. After that, getting the picks are no longer an option.

---