There's so much spin, both in this thread and in draft reporting in general, that it's hard to tell what's real and what's not anymore. Teddy haters take every bad report as gospel truth, Teddy supporters not only deny it entirely, but actually interpret the bad news as secret praise(ie, the team that bashes him actually wants him).

 

I for one don't take much stock in the 'bad reports'(no more than the latest bad reports about Clowney).

The only thing that throws me off and what I can't understand is the 'official response' by the agent... :blink:

 

Seems like the consensus around here is that many times a team that wants "said-player" will actually speak bad about that player, hoping he falls to them in the draft. Everybody does it, every team-GM knows about it, and it is apparently so easy to spot that even us lowly messageboard posters can identify it easily. 

 

So why does Teddy's agent all of a sudden feel the need to publicly refute the 'fake reports'? I don't have an opinion, I'm just trying to reconcile both sides of the argument in this thread.

I mean, if the team who made the 'fake report' wants Teddy, and everybody around the NFL(including Caldwell) knows that it's fake, and everybody on messageboards knows its fake, then why the agent response? 

 

I thought fake/bad reports were a good sign? Why is the agent so 'touchy' then?

Anyways, i just thought it was funny. These 'reports' were non-news to me....until Teddy's agent responded. Weird.

 

Draft-Day is truly going to answer sooooooo many unanswered questions. Still bet a hundred bucks that Teddy-Johnny are the top 2 QBs taken off the board tho. :yes:  

---