Quote:....

Ok his arm strength is greater than (IMO) or at the very least equal to that of Bridgewater, he has similar size a build to Bridgewater, his accuracy is very good and he is one of the best in this class when it comes to placing the ball where he wants it (I think you are referring to completion percentage which is also good). And as far as record goes I am not going to judge a QB on a record. That's like when people say based on the Talent TBs team had and where they were ranked pre-season that Louisville should have gone undefeated.....

 

Also he probably has the fastest release of any QB in this draft. Now we get to pocket presence. He is not a good as Bridgewater when it goes to that at this point in their careers, but he is a solid decision maker and does know how to move in the pocket.

 

All I am saying, is if he has a "whole bunch of average traits", then Bridgewater has a whole bunch of average traits as well, and any other QB in this draft for that matter.

 

I disagree with almost everything here.  And I fail to see how someone 2 inches taller and 10 pounds heavier is similar size.  Bridgewater's size is where a quarterback should be at the minimum... And Murray is even smaller.  I guess since there's no metric, its hard to show you anything besides the tape of who's arm is stronger, and if you've already looked at it and you can't see then there is nothing I can do to convince you how much better of an arm Bridgewater has than Murray.

 

How is this turning into a comparison to Bridgewater anyways?  It's not about Bridgewater.  Its about Murray lacking any distinguishing qualities to make him more than a career backup.

---