I somewhat disagree with the idea of taking these positions in these rounds for the simple fact that some of there's players don't fit the value. A center in the third but the best one in my opinion has a fourth round grade. A fourth round qb after a first round qb; why not one in the sixth. No higher graded defensive player until the 5th round?


Contrary to belief value is much more important than people try make it to be. I agree when you have players of the same grade take the guy that fits the need because you need a tie breaker but always take the value. Otherwise Green Bay doesn't have A-Rod


I would say

1. De/Wr

2. Lb/Leo

3. Qb

4. Wr

4. Leo

5. Wr

5. G

5. C

6. Leo

6. TE

7. G

---