Quote:If you feel no QB is worth the pick at 3, but you do feel there are some worth a first or second round pick, and if you feel it is paramount the Jaguars obtain a QB, then it stands to reason that, if you are right about the value of the QBs, most of the QB needy teams could pass on a QB in the top ten of the draft, but be willing to draft a QB at the top of the second round at least.

 

Of course, this could drive the competition for the signal callers to the point where teams are trading up into the bottom of the first round to ensure they get their guy.

 

Jacksonville picks at 39 (7th pick) in the second round, which means the Jaguars may need to trade up to 32 to ensure they get their guy ahead of Houston, et al.  But considering Cleveland is picking at 26 and needs a QB, will the team need to trade ahead of them, too?

 

How far up would you be willing to deal up to get a QB if the team does not go QB with the 3rd pick?  What would you be willing to give up to get to that spot?

 

Would you be willing to give up a future first round pick to move up to get that signal caller?

 

I wouldn't be willing to trade up at all.  If we like a QB as a franchise QB, we need to either take him at #3 overall.  If we feel that there just isn't value there, trade back to 10 or something and get him there.  

 

I think we need to draft one at 3 or draft one trading back, not trading up.  If someone to us has a low 1st round grade, then he's obviously not a franchise QB in our opinion so trading away a future 1st to obtain him would be foolish, IMO.

---