The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
tinhorns like Mack more than Clowney?
|
Quote:I'm not sure how we'd be giving Clowney to a division rival in this scenario. If Houston takes Mack as the OP indicates, we'd be trading up to #2 to get Clowney. This isn't a trade scenario involving Houston. I was referring to Houston trading down to get the most value for wanting to take Mack or a QB. If they traded with us its very probably MACK and all the QBs will still be there at pick #3 and they would get the guy they wanted and also picked up an extra draft pick in the process. I think it would cost us more to move up to St. Louis if Houston doesn't take him (Clowney), because of what Atlanta would offer them. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.