Quote:I looked up Ware's Scouting Report from 2005 on the old NFLDraftScout page that Rob Rang used to run then compared that to Mack's profile that Rang does for CBSSports.com. There's some interesting coincidences between the two.

 

<p style="margin-left:40px;">Ware: 6-4, 251, 4.56 40, 38 1/2" Vertical, 10' 2" Broad Jump

<p style="margin-left:40px;"> 

<p style="margin-left:40px;">Mack: 6-3, 251, 4.55 40,40" Vertical, 10' 8" Broad Jump

<p style="margin-left:40px;"> 

<p style="margin-left:40px;"> 

<p style="margin-left:40px;">Ware's College career stat line - 27.5 sacks, 195 tackles (57 for losses), 74 quarterback hurries, ten forced fumbles, four fumble recoveries, and one interception.

<p style="margin-left:40px;"> 

<p style="margin-left:40px;">Mack's College career stat line - 28.5, 327 tackles (75 for losses), 31 hurries, 16 forced fumbles, four recoveries, and four interceptions.

<p style="margin-left:40px;"> 

<p style="margin-left:40px;"> 

From my perspective, his numbers are as good or better than Ware's. Now, this by no means is to say that Mack will be the next coming of Ware, but I'd gladly take Ware at #3 overall.

 

 

I tried telling TMD another thread, Khalil Mack is an athletic freak of nature, just like Demarcus Ware. His pure athleticism, strength, and technique translate into production at any level of football. Mack is more versatile than Ware as he drops back comfortably into zone coverage, and sticks to TE's in RB's in man coverage, he's a rare football player that can dominate the game in many ways.

---