Quote:I think a lot of people agree in trying to trade down if Clowney isn't there. I definitely would like to do that. But thats contingent on someone wanting to trade up. If no one wants to, the fact remains that you would want to take Bridgewater and IMO, thats getting worse value at #3 than if we take Mack.

 

I don't see it as worse value than Mack at all. 

 

At worst. Bridgewater is a similarly skilled player at his position as Mack is at his. So then to break that tie, you consider that Bridgewater plays the most important position on the field, and the above premise is proven incorrect. Bridgewater gives you more value than Mack. 

 

Clowney is the only player that at 3, you can really make the argument that he could give more value than Bridgewater and thats because some project him as one of the better players at his position maybe ever, with his raw talent/ physical ability. 

---