Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
NFL.com takes a dig at the "London Jaguars"

#91

Quote:The first sentence is indicative of the national perception..."there may not be many of them."

 

The fact is the Redskins removed 7000 seats from their stadium last season but the Post didn't mention this.

 

The fact is the Redskins only attracted 84% of their capacity while the Jags had 89%.

 

Regards......................the Chiefjag
Whoa now, we can be including facts in this. 

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSIM9bZmkezB9B4qD2qAtT...IGQHCZIPuA]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NFL.com takes a dig at the "London Jaguars" - by Dimson - 04-25-2014, 08:01 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!