Quote:when did i say seattle doesnt have ball hawks? i talked about how earl thomas is a ball hawk right in the post youre referring. so.....idk if you just choose which parts you want to read or what? but also TMD says that sherman sucks and isnt a ball hawk. it was an argument with TMD involving his back and forth all over the fence and how he justifies things. his logic is if a player doesnt have good turnover numbers in college, they will never change and get a lot of interceptions in the nfl. i think sherman is top 2 cb in the nfl and is plenty of a ball hawk and also a great cover corner. but according to TMD logic, sherman didnt have the INT numbers in college, so he would never change.


edit: in terms of our secondary now, i think gratz and cyprien are going to pan out very well, i see INT numbers going up. but our pass rush was abysmal so we will see how they improve this year with what we already signed, and id like to see mack added to make that defense dynamic.

Didn't you say they won without corners who are ballhawks? Now you're saying Sherman is one?


Also, you tried to insult him by saying he should super size your fries yet I have a tough time reading your posts when your grammar is all over the place.


Dont say you want to have an intelligent conversation when you start by insulting someone and then have a tough time putting together a grammatically correct sentence.

---