Quote:I feel the same exact way as you but stacking talent is what should be said.  I'm hearing, let's get our franchise guy in the 2nd-4th so is it stacking talent or just QB in round 1 fear.  Like i said b4, if we dont pick a QB thats in the top 3 then we are getting a future backup at best unless the football gods give us a miracle.  So we agree, its just posters need 2 kill the franchise QB talk unless its TB Blake or Johnny cause THATS real crazy talk unless someone knows something no other team staff thats in or out of the league does. 

 

I'm pretty sure you're hearing voices in your head because I don't think I've seen anyone here say "let's get our franchise guy in the 2nd-4th".  Not that I've seen. 

 

The rest of what you posted....huh?

 

Many here look at the QBs in the draft, and they simply don't see a franchise QB.  They see guys who might be developed into that role, but there's not one in the draft that is a sure thing.  You're a proponent (if I'm interpreting your words) of drafting Bridgewater, Bortles, or Manziel at #3 just because we need to draft a QB, and they've been touted, by the media btw, as the best of the bunch.  You're willing to bypass better players in order to just go get a QB who may or may not prove to be a reach.  That's fine.  We'll know pretty quickly which philosophy is the best approach, and more importantly, which one is in the Jaguars wheel house. 

 

It's clear you have no bias in this discussion, and that you're keeping a completely open mind.  It's those closed minded folks who dare to suggest that we should get the best player on the board at 3, and if we want to look at QBs in the 2nd round as options for development on this team who are the problem here.  All that rational thought is just wasted energy.

---