Quote:Foles...

8-2, 64% completion, 27 TDs, 2 INTs, 9.1 YPA QB rating of 119.2


Vick

2-4, 53% completion, 5 TDs, 3 INTs, 8.6 YPA QB rating of 86.5



Again, if Foles is so terrible and only looks good because of the offense.... Then why did Vick struggle?


Also, why would Barkley get playing time if he was hurt? Sounds like a poor coaching decision to me. Set your injured rookie QB up for failure and risk greater injury??

 

Vick didn't get a chance to get going in a groove like Foles either...

 

I remember in one of Foles first games as starting QB in Kelly's offense, he had one of the least effective performances I could ever remember. It was vs Dallas last year (the first Dallas game) look it up if you don't believe me. 

 

I don't necessarily think Foles is "terrible"....he's just nowhere near as good as some of you goons think he is. He's a "decent" QB that plays in a system that inflates offensive numbers. 

 

Sure, I might rip on him saying he sucks and all, but I just don't like him. He's not Gabbert bad or anything. But the people are on crack if they think he's some sort of "elite" QB. He's not even close. 

---