Quote:But you responded by talking about two pro bowl players... We didn't let any pro bowlers go.  We haven't had a legit pro bowler since MJD.  Last I checked, he is still on the team.

 

You are looking at the surface.  On the surface Chiefs were 2-14.  And on the surface you would think the Jags and Chiefs had comparable talent.  Dig a little deeper.  They had considerably more talent then the Jags.  

 

Defense may not be better, but don't know how you came to the conclusion already that they are worse.  

 

Forget the players for a second then, I'm trying to make the point that gutting the roster of any talent in order to rebuild the roster is insanity and rarly ever works. People ALWAYS respond with "they where 2-14 how could letting anyone go be bad?" It's not a valid argument, a 2-14 team is not void of talent, cutting starters and replacing them with UDFA or journymen Vets is a backward way to build a roster.

 

If the Gene tenure should've taught us anything it's 4 years is WAY to long to give someone to turn it around. I'm tired of hearing "oh but we where so bad give it time" we heard it when Shack took over as GM, Gene took over as GM, and now that Caldwell is taking over, sure lets give it time but damn it don't go backwards to go forward again.

 

I guess I'm just frustrated, we ignored the line (both sides of the ball) we released just about the entire secondary and decided to rock out with 2 rookies and some journeymen, I just look at the roster and I think where did we TRY to get better? I don't see it?

---