Quote:Didn't mean to come of as mad. I know it's The Dead Zone, but this kind of stuff is so silly. But I chose to react, so it is what it is.

 

I just found it humorous that you said Pagono is not good, but offered no supporting evidence other than his team did well when he was out sick. His team has been in the playoffs his two years, you know. I hate to break it to you, but if Bortles is anything close to Luck, Bradley can take some time off as well and the Jags will be just fine. That applies to 90% of NFL coaches. Pete Carroll is a bust  - until he gets a QB and great defense. Now he's a genius?

 

Bradley will be considered a savoir if he makes the playoffs. And of course Bradly will be praised if Bortles turns out to be good, but Pagano is just fortunate to have Luck as his QB?

 

You seem to be saying the only difference in Bradley and Pagano is the QB. So are you saying Bradley is not very good either?

 

Just silly, but I guess it is the silly season.

 

I like a lot about Bradley. He has some consistency. We already know he's not a Jim Harbaugh type that comes in and instantly makes the team better, we saw that in 2013 when the team essentially performed on the same level as it did in 2012.

 

I'm just being realistic about coaching in general, none of the guys in the division will create something that will regularly beat one of the other teams without a parity at the QB position.

 

Like I said, if Pagano had been stuck with a complete failure of a QB like the Jaguars have had he'd have been another 3 or 4 win coach for the last couple of years talking about building something.

 

It's just reality that for the vast majority of teams in the league who is playing at QB is MUCH more important than who is standing on the sideline with a headset.

---