Quote: 

 

As I said from the very beginning... if nothing had changed between the two, Clowney would have been the logical #1 pick if he would have been rated significantly higher (which was expected at the time.)

 

 


 

Why is it when I try my best to be civil with your kind, I always end up regretting doing so... as if I've wandered over to the children's table and expected intelligent conversation instead of a spitball fight?

 

 

 

Regarding comment 1, totally disagree and can't believe you are sticking to this. How many times do you have to see it: 

 

franchise QB > top flight DE

 

 

Regarding comment 2.....seriously? How you can type that with a straight face is beyond me.....then again, I can't see if you're laughing while typing....

 

 

Quote:Pirkster's attempting civil discourse now that his opinion has become a laughing stock. Everyone can see you pivoting, dude.

 

And no, Clowney was never a "lock" for the No. 1 pick. Stop this. No one believes it. As long as you were properly rating Teddy Bridgewater, you knew that Clowney didn't have a shot at being picked first overall by a quarterback-desperate franchise when a franchise quarterback was on the board.

 

Casuals thought Clowney was going first overall because ESPN replayed the Vincent Smith hit roughly 40,000 times over the offseason.

 

Yep. pretty much, all of the above. All of it. 

 

 

Quote:A child born from the Jim Rome school of intelligent discussion.

 

Congrats to you.  You've become one of the biggest jackasses of the board in very short time.

 

This had everything to do with Clowney taking the season off, and absolutley nothing to to with Bridgewater.  Had things remained constant, he'd have more than likely still been the BAP.  Would a QB starved team have passed over him for Bridgewater?  Absolutely.  I alluded to that as well.  You'd have remembered, if you cared to have a civil discussion, but then... I don't expect anything resembling an objective discussion from you.

 

So, we're still refusing to give Bridgewater credit for what he has done to this point? smh

---