Quote:Which has no bearing on my position.

 

I didn't say "GET RID OF HIM FOR WHATEVER CAN BE GOTTEN!" I said I'd trade him if someone were to offer the value that made it worthwhile.

 

That being said I think you have an inflated sense of his value. This is still a team in transition. A guy leading the team in receptions in a year that is likely to feature double digit losses again just doesn't increase his value for the long term.

 

I expect Lee and Robinson will both end up at least as good as Shorts, so if someone were to offer a first rounder or second and third rounder I think it's a deal that Caldwell would have to seriously consider.

Right, because Bradley is fine with losing 10 games this year.  No need to be competitive in the passing game while we transition right?

 

You undervalue the team's intention to be competitive while transitioning.  And Shorts is still quite young -  you assume he has diminishing value while his best seasons may lie ahead.

 

This is off topic - so I'll leave you to your opinions and let the thread return to Sanders.

---