Quote:Well, the truth is the Colts success has been more attributable to luck (lowercase) than Luck the last two years.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.ganggreennation.com/2014/1/19/5323888/ny-jets-the-nfls-luckiest-team'>http://www.ganggreennation.com/2014/1/19/5323888/ny-jets-the-nfls-luckiest-team</a>




<p class="bbc_indent" style="margin-left:40px;">"Of course, such statistics are far from infallible, and history is not destiny. As proof one need look no farther than the 2013 second luckiest team, the <a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/indianapolis-colts'>Indianapolis Colts</a>, with 1.6 more wins than their Expected W-L would indicate. Which team was the 2012 "luckiest" team? The very same Colts, with a whopping 3.8 more wins than Expected W-L would indicate. So the Colts at least bucked the odds two years in a row. On the other hand, they also experienced a pronounced regression toward the Expected W-L number, as they shaved 2.2 wins off their "luck" in 2013."



Fools and trolls can deny it all they want, but that doesn't change the truth.