Quote:where'd this question come from?? :ermm:

 

and, other than selecting Luck and Hilton...not many other good decisions. We'll have to see how Nicks pans out. That could be a pretty good signing if injuries haven't permanently set him back a few notches.

  

Quote:Even if Richardson had a good season, I don't think that was a good deal at all.

I also think the fleener pick was a bad idea. To me, it seemed like they were catering too much to luck and not thinking about the big picture. There was a lot better value to be had there. Especially considering they grabbed Allen not far after.

I don't see the colts as a steadily improving franchise. They have the feel of a team that's just going to stay on a plateau. Just my opinion but I think if they wind up better than 8-8 this year its only because of the weak division.

That question wasn't aimed at you TMD. Mostly aimed at everyone else.


Most of you think Grigson is a bad GM and has made many mistakes. However, you guys also think that Andrew is an average/not good QB. You do realize that both can't be bad/average to lead us to two playoff births and two double digit win seasons in a row. So which one is it? Or are you guys going to pull the lastonealive card of "you just always get lucky"?

---