Quote:  

That question wasn't aimed at you TMD. Mostly aimed at everyone else.


Most of you think Grigson is a bad GM and has made many mistakes. However, you guys also think that Andrew is an average/not good QB. You do realize that both can't be bad/average to lead us to two playoff births and two double digit win seasons in a row. So which one is it? Or are you guys going to pull the lastonealive card of "you just always get lucky"?

 

Personally I think Luck is an excellent QB. Not on the truly elite level yet, but clearly has the makeup for it. I won't be surprised when he's throwing somewhere around 40 TDs in a season.

 

However, that has nothing to do with Grigson. The Luck choice was a true no brainer, anyone at all could have been brought in to pull that lever.

 

Aside from Luck none of Grigson's other moves have come out as exceptional. His trades are boneheaded, his draft picks besides Luck aren't very impactful with the exception of Hilton, who is really just part of Luck's success and would be thought of as "just a guy" if he were part of the Jaguars the last couple of years. Lastly Grigson's choice of head coaches hasn't shown to be exceptional, either. Pagano hasn't done anything so far to show he's not a guy who can come along for a ride of success, but he's clearly not one of the Harbaugh brothers, either.

 

I expect by next season the Jaguars will have passed the colts and your team will spend the next 10 or so years as the Dolphins did to the Bills in the late 80's and early 90's, or even the way the colts did to the Pats and Brady while the colts were still part of the AFCE.

---