I don't understand how Andrew Luck is average. He's played his entire short career with a terrible offensive line, yet still has willed his team to win a lot of games in his short career. If you actually watch him play, he can make any throw on the field and has, he can elude pass rushers, and throw on the run. He shows all of these on a weekly basis, and if you don't agree, then just go back and watch highlights of the Seattle game, against one of the, if not the best defense in the NFL where Luck went up and down the field in the final 3 quarters. You can question anything you want about Luck, but he wins, leads, and shows intangibles that only a select few guys show. Luck has 15 career wins as a starter and 9 game winning drives in 4th/OT. The guy knows how to lead his team to victory and I will take that over any stats or any style points any day. Players like Luck win championships. We had a quarterback that put up crazy stats for 13 years. 

 

 

As for the Colts' GM Grigson, I don't understand why all the criticism. He has pretty much rebuilt the entire team. You don't build championship teams just on 1st round picks. You build them through the entire draft. Basically his entire 1st draft, he found players that contributed right away as rookies on a playoff team. He signed Darius Butler off the streets, who has 4 TDs in his time with the Colts on defense. He found LB Freeman out of the CFL who has been a major producer. Everyone who tries to knock Grigson only looks at the 1st round of the Draft as if that it is any barometer on judging a GM's success. People probably couldn't name off all of the Patriots last 5 1st round picks, yet they keep winning every year. As for that "old guard" that's just a stupid argument. People forget that there was a chance that Mathis and Wayne were going to most likely walk after 2011. But Grigson and Pagano both convinced them to stay. It is also a dumb argument because every winning team wins with veterans and the Colts are included. 

---