Hmm...  just as I kind of suspected all along.  This wasn't some "innocent child" gunned down for no reason.  He wasn't shot in the back.  There is some question as to whether or not he had his hands up.

 

Which is the most likely scenario?  I'm not saying one or the other is fact, just putting this out there for consideration.

 

SCENARIO 1 - This was some "innocent child" that was just walking down the street, was approached by police, was cooperative, had his hands up surrendering and was shot in the back for no reason.  This is the narrative that has been fed to us for the past week.

 

SCENARIO 2 - This was a very large thug that has no respect for the law or authority.  He has just committed a strong arm robbery and is walking down the middle of a street disrupting traffic.  He is confronted by the police, becomes combative and when he charges the police officer he is shot multiple times.  Perhaps the "hands up" thing wasn't because he was surrendering, rather it was a natural instinct to "shield" one's self after being struck by at least one bullet.

 

It's starting to appear more and more like scenario 2 is probably closer to the actual story.

---