Just watched a Meet the Press segment on Rand Paul performing pro bono eye surgeries in Guatemala.  Being the typical biased MSM, they pass at no opportunity to leverage it into criticism.  Some of it fair, most of it pure pettiness.  Were this Hillary Clinton, MTP would have had harp music playing on a sound track as they framed her as the Greatest Person Who Ever Lived.   And they wonder why their ratings are tanking.  I commented a couple of weeks ago, before the replacement of David Gregory was announced, that MTP panelist Chuck Todd was unabashedly biased (I believe I said he hand washed Obama's underwear).  Well guess who was named as Gregory's replacement? 

 

Is it too much to ask for a media that attempts objectivity?  

---