The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Cecil Shorts III ruled OUT for tomorrow's game
|
I have high hopes for the Lee/Robinson/Hurns combo for the next five years. I'd add more to that list but when you think about it, do you really need more than three good wideouts? Thinking back over the past 30 years or so, I can't think of many teams who had a need for more than three.
San Diego - Winslow (TE), Joiner, Jefferson Miami - Clayton/Duper Minnesota - Moss/Carter/Reed Indy - Harrison/Wayne There's probably many others I'm missing but if they can have three solid receivers, one of which turns out to be a true #1, they should be set for a long time.
<FONT size=3>The secret to surfing is don't do anything.</FONT>
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.