The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
***OFFICIAL*** Baseball Thread 2014
|
Quote:Umps were horrible. I couldn't believe how poorly they handled the situation. End result: Stanton out (most likely for the year), Mcgehee, Redmond, and then one of the next pitchers got ejected. Yeah Kellog went to the 3rd base ump who said on both calls Stanton and Johnson both went around. I get that, but I thought my interpretation was that how could a batter stop his swing when the ball is about to make contact with his body. Then I saw this on MLB. after some research. Rule 6.08(b). The batter becomes a runner and is entitled to first base without liability to be put out (provided he advances to and touches first base) when - He is touched by a pitched ball which he is not attempting to hit unless (1) The ball is in the strike zone when it touches the batter, or (2) The batter makes no attempt to avoid being touched by the ball; If the ball is in the strike zone when it touches the batter, it shall be called a strike, whether or not the batter tries to avoid the ball. http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/off...tter_6.jsp I would figure that rule would exempt a hit batsmen. Quote:Haven't seen the play yet, but that sucks for Stanton and the Marlins. Was this a retaliatory thing, or a pitch that got away? It was a pitch that got away. I wouldnt be surprised to see Fiers get a fine on the second hit though.
Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.