Quote:I'm not saying you need to own land to have a say. That was for a specific time period when they where building a nation, that time has long past.

 

Being armed has nothing to do with protest, it was written in specifically for the protection of the individual against oppression.

So what would be the cut off now to disallow people to vote?

 

I am just pointing out something I perceive as unbalanced. Universal ability to own a weapon you can kill anyone with but not the ability to vote for leadership of a nation you are a citizen of and directly impacted by the laws made by them.  

 

Being armed is a protection against oppression... Note being able to vote is somehow not oppression?

---