Quote:There is still no proof of innocence. Legally, every one of those names are still listed as guilty of their crimes. If that is a problem for you, your issue is not with me for pointing it out, but with the legal system. Perhaps you "smart people" should challenge the legal system as to why they won't exonerate an innocent person, even if they have been executed. 

 

The reason it would never happen is that the legal system and the legal fraternity is and will always be self-serving first. It is a perversion of what the founding founders intended it to be, and they would rightfully be ashamed at what it has become.

 

So, remember, no matter what you say, you will never be able to win this because those people are legally judged guilty. They were never proven innocent. Until then, you simply have no argument. If and when that changes, I will gladly concede.

You concede to framing your argument on a point that has no basis for fact, reality, or the basis for how the law works.


Great. Well done.


Basically, you have avoided the issues at all cost, ignored points and questions as to your own argument. Like I said, disingenuous, and frankly a dishonest way to discuss an issue. And again.... You have fooled no one.


Only a fool really believes innocent people haven't been executed. That really isn't even your point anymore, though, and everyone sees right through this.


At the end, all you've done is certainly proven the point you are A-ok with innocent people being executed, which goes against everything our nation is based on.


Well done there as well. Thank you for making it so obvious

---