Quote:Yet that is exactly what those who choose to stand the entire game do. See how that works? It goes both ways. The difference in all of this is that the overwhelming majority of fans who attend these games choose to SIT for most of it. What you're not getting is what you are saying is the rights of the few should outweigh the rights of the many. That's why everything is going to hell these days. Every small group out there thinks their rights should be validated, even when it means infringing on the rights of the majority.

You choose to sit, someone else stands. My condoning people's right to choose how to watch a football game does not in any sensible way equate to either selfishness nor trying to get others to conform. I'm saying the opposite. I am done with this topic now. Only you and two of your friends are arguing about this and refuse to see the logic and rationale in anything I am saying. I also didn't come here for immature name calling simply for being on board for the right to choose how to watch a football game.This is the post that broke the camel's back, as I cannot debate an issue with someone who doesn't understand how my point is COMPLETELY OPPOSITE to conforming. All I know is when I go to a game and if I feel like standing because of my spine surgery, or FOR ANY OTHER REASON, I most certainly WILL DO SO for however long as I feel like as well. Hopefully, you'll be sitting behind me. If so, I'll be sure to say hello and move as much out of your way as I possibly can after you politely ask me to. Perhaps then, you will see how your use of the word "selfish" over this topic, isn't valid to what I am saying.

---