Quote:Wait, what? You specifically said that you were against all narcotic laws. Your words, not mine. Why do you feel like it's up to the local government to determine how old someone has to be to drive a car? Smoke a cigarette? Drink a beer? Those three "rights" are given to people at different stages in life (16, 18. and 21). Why do you support local government setting those arbitrary ages for when "adulthood" begins? What if local government decided that people shouldn't be allowed to do meth until they were 30. Doing meth before 30 would be a criminal act, just like drinking before 21, smoking before 18, and driving before 16. Would you support that?

I'm about done letting you play dense I've said it here and other threads I oppose narcotic laws. if there needs to be clarification that is referring only to legal adults than fine yes I'm taking about legal adults that have full legal responsibility for themselves.


The age factor is a nonissue your trying to pin down some arbitrary age when is someone an adult. Right now at 18 your a legal adult there should be no law restricting what you eat smoke drink who you marry love or sleep with what you say think or who you do business with. I know that's going to send you into a panic on how society would fall apart.

---