Quote:You couldn't just give me two sentences?   If I google "Eric Holder guilty of sedition," I get a huge pile of results, none of which deal with Holder being guilty of sedition.   I get "tea party guilty of sedition," I get "Obama wants to usher in Sharia law..."  etc etc etc.  

 

Here we are on a political discussion board, someone says Eric Holder is guilty of sedition, I ask how is that, and people can't give me two sentences of explanation?   He did this, he did that, and that meets the definition of sedition... and so forth. 

 

It's just a simple question.   If no one can answer it, I have to assume you guys really have nothing and are just throwing around a bunch of empty rhetoric.   

 

I don't think he's guilty of sedition, but I'd argue he's guilty of obstruction of justice.

 

It's hard to "prove" anything when you can't have access to all the facts, but there's been reports about Fast and Furious and the cover up. His refusal to investigate the IRS scandal. his admittance they will not investigate poll intimidation by the New Black Panther party. I can go on where he's at the very least a horrible AG most likely guilty of obstruction of justice. 

---