Quote:You can't just feel logic is flawed, you have to show why logic is flawed.


However, that aside you're making an ignorant argument here. You can't think of a coach that won with a bad team, so therefore you still believe that Gus could be an elite coach, and that Mularky is one, too, since they had similar results?

That's where you're logic is flawed. You keep trying to compartemtalize these guys into categories such as elite or bad etc... None of that matters when you don't have players to execute the plays. I can call Norv Turner a bad coach because he had talent and couldn't get it done. It's impossible to judge the guy who hasn't been given talent to even start with lol.


How can we judge the offense if there is no qb that can make the throws? The line looks a lot better with Bortles back there. Now you can properly assess what needs to be added.


I'm reserving judgement on Gus but I think hes a good coach. He won more games with more rookies than Malarkey could with a 100 million dollar defense.


And to be honest I withheld judgement on Malarkey too because Blaine was his guy. I think it's best to give this guy some time. And see what can happen.


You must like the raiders approach? Keep changing coaches until lighting in a bottle is caught. Then go from their.

---