Quote:Aside from the Redskins game, we've faced some pretty stiff competition. And in the Redskins game we were still being hampered by Chad Henne. And we were also being hampered by having a very young team.


I agree that Fisch and Babich could both be parts of the problem. I think that Gus Bradley is a guy who is willing to give too many opportunities at times. I think we should have made some moves at the end of last season. His lack of experience (and the Jags not being an attractive spot to land for coaches) can't be held against him too much. I don't think there's many coaches who would want to come here pre-Bortles. Availability matters, and so does the amount of talent on the team.



Jimmy Johnson didn't take over what was essentially an expansion team. If you look at the lack of talent on the team, it explains the lack of wins very well. The team should be showing improvement, but I don't think we can say if any improvement is being made at this point. It's a very young team, with few draft picks on the Defensive side of the ball.

Bortles isn't regressing. His stats don't look quite as good, but that's in part due to facing tougher defenses, not having a running game (which keeps the Defense honest), and playcalling, as well as the players we have.


Why would a proven winner come here, when we don't give coaches time to bring the talent in, and blame them for the problems? We don't want to become the Oakland Raiders. I think Bradley goes on the hot seat at the start of next season.

I think you said the best thing here. People are wanting to cut heads off but say Harbaugh is coming into the picture as a coach that can be the next canidate.


Why on earth would he come here when we fired Malarkey after a year and Gus after two? Regardless if you like it or not we must give time for that simple reason. This is why the raiders never will be any good. They won't stay still for 3-4 years.


I know no one wants to hear that buts it's the truth.

---