Quote:Yes... fire the Head Coach again...  Take a look at the Browns' coaching history and tell me how that's worked out.

 

Are the Browns bad because they hired and fired a lot of head coaches, or have they been bad because they simply continued to hire  BAD head coaches?

 

Quote:I believe you fire the coach after he's had some time to prove he can be the guy.

 

Gus hasn't proven squat yet.  I'm not saying fire him today or tomorrow, but if you start your career 4-12 and then a hypotethical 3-13, and follow that up with a 1-4 start in year 3, does that require further patience?  

 

Not at all. 

 

2 years is enough to start showing something. Look at where the Dallas Cowboys were by the end of year 2 under the Jimmy Johnson regime. And this was after finishing 1-15 in his first year. 

 

Quote:I think this team is a special case. Shack was bad. Gene was worse. It's not like this team is complete; it's not. Most coaches are at least afforded complete rosters.


Do you think a Chip Kelly (or whoever) would be doing any better?

 

No this is not a special case. Gimme a break. Its excuses like that that have this team in a 14 year funk. 

 

Quote:Bradley is a fake.  

 

We need a coach with a proven record who knows how to hire assistants.

 

I agree. 

 

Quote:I think an Andy Reid would do better.

 

I think there are a number of coaches that would be doing better than Bradley over the last 2 years had they been our coach. Andy Reid is only one of them. 

---