Quote:There are affidavits from two witnesses saying that she:

 

1. Was engaging in oral sex

2. Was on top of Winston engaging in a sexual act

 

If she was raped, why did she only charge Casher and Darby (the two witnesses) with just videotaping? Why did she not charge them with not coming to protect her? Why didn't she charge them with aiding in this so called "rape"?

 

And you can disagree with me all you want, but this has been a smear campaign from the start. They are literally bringing up anything they can to make him look like a villain. From the BB gun incident, to the drink incident at Burger King. Now this crap with the autographs. 

 

Quote:Then why don't they tell both sides of the story? Regardless of which side you are on, both sides deserve to be told.

 

i agree but chances are both sides are lying. they were both most likely intoxicated, and we dont know the details.

 

there have been plenty of times a woman has engaged in oral sex and not wanted to go further, so who is to say that wasnt the case?

 

in terms of not charging the witnesses, i dont know the law well enough to speculate on that.

 

i just think its plausable that he raped her and it seems like the police dept and university went through great lengths to cover up something.

 

either way it seems to me like winston is a bad egg. incident after incident after incident just doesnt bode well.

---