Quote:homebiscuit -


Those are all baseless assumptions, and not true. You did not argue a single point, yet attack me personally. You are the epitome of the modern American voter. The standard bearer of the ignorant citizen. Moronic, clueless, illogical, and selfish. Congratulations on being a blue-pilled sheep.


Eric, thank you for properly addressing each point. The purpose for those five points are:


1. By reaching the minimum income, you are either providing a valuable skill to the work force, or producing something valuable to society. To reach this level, you must have some common semblance of intelligence in managing finance and a general understanding of basic economics. You can argue people can fall into income, which is true, but doesn't deter the fact that they still must manage it, and it is still taxed.

2. Education is definitely important. The more educated the voting base is, the more likely they are to vote on knowledge rather than emotion. You shouldn't look at this from the "All colleges are liberal" standpoint, but rather that a person who understands why they are voting for an individual is a much better voter than someone who votes the party line. You don't need a college education to understand, but it is an important base line. Plus, most modern college tracks require government, history, finance, or economics classes.

3. Skills training is trying to reach #1, while in-education is trying to reach #1 or #2. Both are valuable to society.

4. For those who don't want to or cant reach #1 or #2, but can still be valuable voters.

5. If you work for the government, you have a say in it's direction.


By reaching one of these 5 points, you have either proven value to society, or knowledgeable enough to vote.


None of these objectives are out of the reach for any US citizen, but keep parasites and valueless sheep like homebiscuit from voting the US into extreme debt, pointless wars, unethical economic practice, and unlawful expansion.