Quote:Yea I see a problem with your flawed statements. No ones rhetoric is the poor shouldn't have birth control. The argument is it's up to companies what they cover. Since when did birth control become a right?

 

Well, you are correct.  There is not right or entitlement granted to anyone.

 

However...

 

We do live in the USA.  So there are certain things that we get to decide.

 

That's why I laid out the premise, rhetoric, policy theorem.

 

As a society, we are presumed to have a say one way or another regarding decisions that are not unanimous.

 

Regarding birth-control...  It's never been clearly established what is what...  Even though ROE V WADE did a great job of actually laying down the foundation of why a woman's decision should be the primary factor.  

 

But here we are, discussing the foundation that was the basis of RvW.  The Supreme Court in that decision found that a person is not founded based on conception.  Therefore a woman who carries is still a whole citizen and get's to decide how to proceed.  

 

This brings us back to my "Premise"

 

Abortion is bad/evil and kills people that do not have a say in their own life choice



 

So if that's the premise, how does a society reduce this?



 

Abstenence?  Reduction of cheap birth control?



 

Seems like a really bad policy

---