Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Bortles was bad...but.

#1
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2014, 09:46 AM by Ringo.)

It was his worst game. However, the question arises that we coulda won with Henne.

Maybe. The D was ferocious.

But, the Browns played a total different D with Bortles vs Henne. Although it didn't seem to matter, it does in a way.

Blake has to get his INTs down. He wasn't an INT machine in college, so it's fixable.

His competitiveness, toughness and accountability to himself will make him a good QB.


Gus said 24 hour revelry. Screw you Gus. We are doing the rest of the week. We needed it. A good Dawg pounding.


Someone wrote in today's Monday morning QB....hopefully the light at the end of the tunnel is the rear end of the train. Let's hope.

Bring on the Fish. They're on the same roll the Browns were.
Blakes Life Matters
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
Bortles was bad...but. - by Ringo - 10-20-2014, 09:45 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 09:51 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Monty - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jags_r_bake - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by muddylips - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jtmoney - 10-20-2014, 10:03 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by SpeedyG - 10-20-2014, 10:40 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by WingerDinger - 10-20-2014, 10:43 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DewtheMathis - 10-20-2014, 10:46 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFanatic24 - 10-20-2014, 11:16 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by KFL - 10-20-2014, 11:23 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jagherd - 10-20-2014, 11:28 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Eleventh Doctor - 10-20-2014, 11:33 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 11:34 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 11:42 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jobclarke - 10-20-2014, 11:50 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:51 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 11:53 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:57 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JAGANTIUS - 10-20-2014, 12:00 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:02 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by trunt87 - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:06 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:07 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:08 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:09 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:11 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:14 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:22 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Senor Fantastico - 10-20-2014, 01:21 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:41 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:51 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by StroudCrowd1 - 10-20-2014, 02:53 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:10 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by knarnn - 10-20-2014, 03:13 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 03:15 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:16 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:23 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:26 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Rooster - 10-20-2014, 07:23 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by lastonealive - 10-20-2014, 09:27 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by AP06 - 10-20-2014, 09:34 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Michael O'Brien - 10-20-2014, 09:46 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jaguarmvp - 10-20-2014, 10:53 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:18 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:21 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Scarecrow - 10-20-2014, 11:22 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 03:47 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by sublime92 - 10-21-2014, 03:56 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 04:02 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Mike1989 - 10-21-2014, 05:49 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFox1 - 10-21-2014, 06:17 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by homebiscuit - 10-21-2014, 06:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JaguarJosh05 - 10-21-2014, 06:59 AM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!