Quote:It was his worst game. However, the question arises that we coulda won with Henne.

Maybe. The D was ferocious.

But, the Browns played a total different D with Bortles vs Henne. Although it didn't seem to matter, it does in a way.

Blake has to get his INTs down. He wasn't an INT machine in college, so it's fixable.

His competitiveness, toughness and accountability to himself will make him a good QB.


Gus said 24 hour revelry. Screw you Gus. We are doing the rest of the week. We needed it. A good Dawg pounding.


Someone wrote in today's Monday morning QB....hopefully the light at the end of the tunnel is the rear end of the train. Let's hope.

Bring on the Fish. They're on the same roll the Browns were.

The browns would've definitely defended differently against Henne than Bortles. With Bortles, you've got to at least be concerned with him throwing 10+ yards down the field; but with Henne, you can pretty much commit to stopping the run as he has seldom shown any inclination to go 'downtown' with the ball. In other words, with Henne at quarterback, the browns could run the same defense on us that we were against them. Winner? Browns.

---