The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Bortles was bad...but.
|
10-20-2014, 11:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2014, 11:33 AM by The Eleventh Doctor.)
Bortles made mistakes, but he didn't let them get to him. Keep in mind that Peyton Manning in his prime once threw 6 interceptions. That's not his rookie year, that's his prime. I'm not comparing him to Manning here. I'm saying if even one of the greatest QB's of all time can have that kind of day, then there's no reason to expect our QB not to. I have a feeling once our WR's get it together, we'll see more TD's and fewer INT's from Bortles.
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Bortles was bad...but. - by Ringo - 10-20-2014, 09:45 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 09:51 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Monty - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jags_r_bake - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by muddylips - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jtmoney - 10-20-2014, 10:03 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by SpeedyG - 10-20-2014, 10:40 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by WingerDinger - 10-20-2014, 10:43 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DewtheMathis - 10-20-2014, 10:46 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFanatic24 - 10-20-2014, 11:16 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by KFL - 10-20-2014, 11:23 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jagherd - 10-20-2014, 11:28 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Eleventh Doctor - 10-20-2014, 11:33 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 11:34 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 11:42 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jobclarke - 10-20-2014, 11:50 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:51 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 11:53 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:57 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JAGANTIUS - 10-20-2014, 12:00 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:02 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by trunt87 - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:06 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:07 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:08 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:09 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:11 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:14 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:22 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Senor Fantastico - 10-20-2014, 01:21 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:41 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:51 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by StroudCrowd1 - 10-20-2014, 02:53 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:10 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by knarnn - 10-20-2014, 03:13 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 03:15 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:16 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:23 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:26 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Rooster - 10-20-2014, 07:23 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by lastonealive - 10-20-2014, 09:27 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by AP06 - 10-20-2014, 09:34 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Michael O'Brien - 10-20-2014, 09:46 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jaguarmvp - 10-20-2014, 10:53 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:18 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:21 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Scarecrow - 10-20-2014, 11:22 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 03:47 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by sublime92 - 10-21-2014, 03:56 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 04:02 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Mike1989 - 10-21-2014, 05:49 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFox1 - 10-21-2014, 06:17 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by homebiscuit - 10-21-2014, 06:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JaguarJosh05 - 10-21-2014, 06:59 AM
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.