Bortles was bad...but.

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Bortles was bad...but.

pirkster
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,177
Threads: 118
Joined: May 2006
Reputation: 74

#30

10-20-2014, 12:08 PM

Quote:I know bortles played bad yesterday...but I have a funny question has he improved? To me improvement would be 0 int in a game, take care of the football. Again when people say Peyton Manning threw 27 int his rookie year

what they don't talk about is the games Peyton went 30/48 330 3 TD 0 Int. That what I want to see from Blake.

Was Garrards low INT season an "improvement"?

No.

It was simply an anomaly, from a year where they did everything manageable to ensure he protected the football. You don't want a franchise QB playing that tight.

This season Bortles' INT ratio (and the ratio is what's important) will not be good. Closer to 3/1 would be good a year from now, and put him among the elite.

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Messages In This Thread

Bortles was bad...but. - by Ringo - 10-20-2014, 09:45 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 09:51 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Monty - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by jags_r_bake - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by muddylips - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by jtmoney - 10-20-2014, 10:03 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by SpeedyG - 10-20-2014, 10:40 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by WingerDinger - 10-20-2014, 10:43 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by DewtheMathis - 10-20-2014, 10:46 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFanatic24 - 10-20-2014, 11:16 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by KFL - 10-20-2014, 11:23 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by jagherd - 10-20-2014, 11:28 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by The Eleventh Doctor - 10-20-2014, 11:33 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 11:34 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 11:42 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by jobclarke - 10-20-2014, 11:50 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:51 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 11:53 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:57 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by JAGANTIUS - 10-20-2014, 12:00 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:02 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by trunt87 - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:06 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:07 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:08 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:09 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:11 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:14 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:22 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Senor Fantastico - 10-20-2014, 01:21 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:41 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:51 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by StroudCrowd1 - 10-20-2014, 02:53 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:10 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by knarnn - 10-20-2014, 03:13 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 03:15 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:16 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:23 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:26 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Rooster - 10-20-2014, 07:23 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by lastonealive - 10-20-2014, 09:27 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by AP06 - 10-20-2014, 09:34 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Michael O'Brien - 10-20-2014, 09:46 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by jaguarmvp - 10-20-2014, 10:53 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:18 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:21 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Scarecrow - 10-20-2014, 11:22 PM

Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 03:47 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by sublime92 - 10-21-2014, 03:56 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 04:02 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by Mike1989 - 10-21-2014, 05:49 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFox1 - 10-21-2014, 06:17 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by homebiscuit - 10-21-2014, 06:54 AM

Bortles was bad...but. - by JaguarJosh05 - 10-21-2014, 06:59 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.