The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Bortles was bad...but.
|
Quote:Last comment in a negative thread title..Because he was. He leads in INTs thrown in the league, yet didnt start the season. Cant sugar coat everything. Even he admits he played poorly ( is that sound better than bad?) If the D hadnt played lights out and the Browns put up a couple of TDs, we lose. Bortles will be good ( hopefully) but for now? He's on the huge learning curve. Some passes were good, some were pretty bad, decision wise. Bortles gets all the free passes here because of the "possibilities". He eventually will be the one who has to win the game. Someone mentioned we beat the Browns last year too...with Henne. Not trying to bash the kid, just be realistic. The Favre gunslinger comparisons or Mannings first year comparison are so premature. He needs to develop. Plain and simple. The team knew it and said as much. Their plan was not to get him in this early. There will be growing pains, but to call a spade a spade shouldn't upset anyone. |
Messages In This Thread |
Bortles was bad...but. - by Ringo - 10-20-2014, 09:45 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 09:51 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Monty - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 09:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jags_r_bake - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by muddylips - 10-20-2014, 09:59 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jtmoney - 10-20-2014, 10:03 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by SpeedyG - 10-20-2014, 10:40 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by WingerDinger - 10-20-2014, 10:43 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DewtheMathis - 10-20-2014, 10:46 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFanatic24 - 10-20-2014, 11:16 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by KFL - 10-20-2014, 11:23 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jagherd - 10-20-2014, 11:28 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Eleventh Doctor - 10-20-2014, 11:33 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 11:34 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 11:42 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jobclarke - 10-20-2014, 11:50 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:51 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 11:53 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 11:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 11:57 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JAGANTIUS - 10-20-2014, 12:00 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:02 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by trunt87 - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:03 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by The Mad Dog - 10-20-2014, 12:06 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:07 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:08 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:09 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:11 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by pirkster - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by badger - 10-20-2014, 12:12 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:14 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by TrueFan - 10-20-2014, 12:22 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Senor Fantastico - 10-20-2014, 01:21 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:41 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Perro Rabioso - 10-20-2014, 02:51 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by StroudCrowd1 - 10-20-2014, 02:53 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:10 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by knarnn - 10-20-2014, 03:13 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Raven09s - 10-20-2014, 03:15 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:16 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by P. Haze - 10-20-2014, 03:23 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Cleatwood - 10-20-2014, 03:26 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Rooster - 10-20-2014, 07:23 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by lastonealive - 10-20-2014, 09:27 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by AP06 - 10-20-2014, 09:34 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Michael O'Brien - 10-20-2014, 09:46 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by jaguarmvp - 10-20-2014, 10:53 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:18 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by DavidzPimpSuit - 10-20-2014, 11:21 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Scarecrow - 10-20-2014, 11:22 PM
Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 03:47 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by sublime92 - 10-21-2014, 03:56 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 04:02 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by Mike1989 - 10-21-2014, 05:49 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JagFox1 - 10-21-2014, 06:17 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by homebiscuit - 10-21-2014, 06:54 AM
Bortles was bad...but. - by JaguarJosh05 - 10-21-2014, 06:59 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.