Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought.

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought.

~~BasshunterX~~
Banned
Posts: 503
Threads: 38
Joined: Dec 2010

10-21-2014, 01:08 PM

Our line is consisted of 2 rookies, 2 second year players and a veteran. All of which are improving at a sharp/noticeable rate. I still don't subscribe to the zone blocking scheme but the players are getting better with it.

Thinking ahead to 2015, If this unit gets better, All of a sudden I think we can rule out getting an O-linemen in the first round. Turn our attention toward maybe TE, FS, LB, or less likely HB. I think Bortles needs some veteran's around him and I think we can get a good TE in F/A. With all this said however, I think our depth at the position is questionable and as such more late round rookies/value FA's are needed.

Fun fact: Our starting center came from the pick Caldwell got from Gabbert to 49ers.

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!

Messages In This Thread

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by BasshunterX - 10-21-2014, 01:08 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 01:10 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by JagFanatic24 - 10-21-2014, 01:14 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Etdavis2006 - 10-21-2014, 01:15 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Scarecrow - 10-21-2014, 01:16 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by JAG-ON - 10-21-2014, 01:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by The Mad Dog - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by NYC4jags - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by The Mad Dog - 10-21-2014, 01:26 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 01:59 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 01:59 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by badger - 10-21-2014, 02:01 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Jags32250 - 10-21-2014, 02:05 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 02:06 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Monty - 10-21-2014, 02:06 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:11 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Monty - 10-21-2014, 02:13 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by git'er_done - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by badger - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 02:37 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 02:41 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:43 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 02:56 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by TJBender - 10-21-2014, 03:02 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 03:10 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 03:13 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 03:17 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by maheo30 - 10-21-2014, 03:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 03:19 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 03:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by WingerDinger - 10-21-2014, 03:24 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by HURRICANE!!! - 10-21-2014, 03:38 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Jaguar Warrior - 10-21-2014, 03:43 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by SpeedyG - 10-21-2014, 03:47 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 03:48 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.