Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought.

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought.

git'er_done
Journeyman
Posts: 1,606
Threads: 8
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 0

#21

10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Quote:I haven't got to see any of your games. That being said, Jacksonville has given up a league leading 29 sacks. Also telling is the 3rd worst 86 yards per game rushing. Has it been prior to the last 2 weeks that makes up the majority of those numbers? On paper, that is just terrible O-line play. Horrible.

No one's doubting that there were struggles. The hope is for improvement going forward. And looking at statistics that were skewed by some really horrendous performances (including by those who are now either on the bench or on another team) have nothing to do with whether the OL is improving.

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!

Messages In This Thread

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by BasshunterX - 10-21-2014, 01:08 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 01:10 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by JagFanatic24 - 10-21-2014, 01:14 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Etdavis2006 - 10-21-2014, 01:15 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Scarecrow - 10-21-2014, 01:16 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by JAG-ON - 10-21-2014, 01:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by The Mad Dog - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by NYC4jags - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by The Mad Dog - 10-21-2014, 01:26 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 01:59 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 01:59 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by badger - 10-21-2014, 02:01 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Jags32250 - 10-21-2014, 02:05 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 02:06 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Monty - 10-21-2014, 02:06 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:11 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Monty - 10-21-2014, 02:13 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by git'er_done - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by badger - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 02:37 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 02:41 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:43 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 02:56 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by TJBender - 10-21-2014, 03:02 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 03:10 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 03:13 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 03:17 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by maheo30 - 10-21-2014, 03:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 03:19 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 03:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by WingerDinger - 10-21-2014, 03:24 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by HURRICANE!!! - 10-21-2014, 03:38 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Jaguar Warrior - 10-21-2014, 03:43 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by SpeedyG - 10-21-2014, 03:47 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 03:48 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.