Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought.

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought.

Raven09s
Journeyman
Posts: 1,039
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 0

#33

10-21-2014, 03:22 PM

Quote:I'm sorry TC, but we were never taking an o-lineman with our first pick anyway. Not where we'll be picking because you don't take guards, centers, or right tackles that high. Based on early projections, I think we take a WR, DT, or DE. Their won't be an LB worth taking top 5. Not yet, although we have a long ways until the draft so anything can happen. Maybe someone steps up.

I honestly don't even care anymore where they pick a player. As long as it's not any type of kicker or long snapper I don't care where they're drafted. If they want to pick a guard in the top 5, you won't hear me complaining about it if he dominates the position. If they take a LB in the top five and he ends up like Luke Kuechly I'll be extremely happy. Really don't care. Just get good players and let the coaches coach them.

Messages In This Thread

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by BasshunterX - 10-21-2014, 01:08 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by NCJag - 10-21-2014, 01:10 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by JagFanatic24 - 10-21-2014, 01:14 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Etdavis2006 - 10-21-2014, 01:15 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Scarecrow - 10-21-2014, 01:16 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by JAG-ON - 10-21-2014, 01:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by The Mad Dog - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by NYC4jags - 10-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by The Mad Dog - 10-21-2014, 01:26 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 01:59 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 01:59 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by badger - 10-21-2014, 02:01 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Jags32250 - 10-21-2014, 02:05 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 02:06 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Monty - 10-21-2014, 02:06 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:11 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Monty - 10-21-2014, 02:13 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by git'er_done - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by badger - 10-21-2014, 02:32 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 02:37 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 02:41 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 02:43 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 02:56 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by TJBender - 10-21-2014, 03:02 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 03:10 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by B2hibry - 10-21-2014, 03:13 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by pirkster - 10-21-2014, 03:17 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by maheo30 - 10-21-2014, 03:18 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by huck1974 - 10-21-2014, 03:19 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 03:22 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by WingerDinger - 10-21-2014, 03:24 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by HURRICANE!!! - 10-21-2014, 03:38 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Jaguar Warrior - 10-21-2014, 03:43 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by SpeedyG - 10-21-2014, 03:47 PM

Hmm. O-line might be more stable than we thought. - by Raven09s - 10-21-2014, 03:48 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.