Quote:Have you read the amendment? It's not written tightly enough to make clear who will benefit and who will administer the "medical" marijuana.

 

Please research the arguments against it, as they can explain it better than I (it would take me a while, as I'm no speed typist).

 

I am in no way against Amend. #2 because of religious convictions or because I'm anti-dope (please smoke responsibly!).

 

And I'm not even getting into the argument that all such amendments should be denied, as the Constitution is not the proper place for this. The Legislature should be dealing with this - but being politicians ...

 

http://ballotpedia.org/Florida_Right_to_...%282014%29

 

If anything I'd argue the amendment doesn't go far enough, But where is this loose language about it not defining who will benefit and administer marijuana? It clearly says it would only be legal in Florida if prescribed by a medical doctor and is only legal for use by the person specified in the script. It would essentially have the same controls as all the pharmaceuticals. It would still be prohibited for Floridians to use marijuana for recreational use.

---