Quote:TG

2014-09-07 1 JAX @ PHI L 17-34 18 42 2.33

2014-09-14 2 JAX @ WAS L 10-41 7 8 1.14

2014-09-21 3 JAX   IND L 17-44 9 32 3.56

2014-09-28 4 JAX @ SDG L 14-33 10 32 3.20 1

 

DR

2014-09-07 1 JAX @ PHI L 17-34 3 8 2.67 

2014-09-14 2 JAX @ WAS L 10-41 0 0   0

2014-09-21 3 JAX   IND L 17-44 8 33 4.13

2014-09-28 4 JAX @ SDG L 14-33 9 25 2.78 0

 

There's your stats from the first 4 games when the Oline was horrifically bad. It didn't matter at the time who was getting the ball, they were all unproductive because of the instability in front of them. Denard better? Sure, I'll buy that today, but let's not act like it clear and apparent from week 1, they were all unproductive back then.

 

Denard is unquestionably better suited for our system. It's not even close. I'm fine with Toby being used in short yardage situations and on screen passes where he can get rumbling downhill. However, running him repeatedly on zone stretch plays like we did in the first part of the season on early downs is asking for 3rd and long and a putrid running game. Denard is far better suited to be the feature back behind this line and in this offense.

---