Quote:Ok, so you're gonna call me out on reading comprehension and intelligence, yet you obviously didn't read thru all my posts.  Thanks for underlining the obvious, if you hadn't done that i neve would have been able to understand it.  Also the caps.  If you re-read everything i've posted, you'll realize i'm agreeing with everything you just said (which is obvious, sherlock) and that i just don't like using the Peyton reference.  Obviously he threw interceptions and obviously he turned out well.  I've heard the same comparison around here for weeks now.  I don't like it.  I think it's silly that he's the one outlier that everyone brings up.  I could do the same, but i'd rather watch Blake be Blake.  But throw some more insults my way why don't you?

 

And BTW, while we're talking about reading comprehension, which you so eloquently bash the board for, who's calling Blake a bust? Or reached his ceiling?  Lol...

 

And while we're at it, water is actually not wet.  Carry on.

 

There's a difference between reading comprehension and reading all of your inane prattling posts.

 

But it's interesting that you've missed the posts where Blake has been called a bust but take issue with me not reading 4 pages of your nonsense. 

 

So basically, you've started a thread to whine about people using a Peyton comparison and let us all know that Bortles needs to cut down on his interceptions. Gotcha. I look forward to some more insightful commentary from you in the future. Maybe next time you can start a thread telling us how the DBs need to cover better or that our rookie WRs need to run better routes or that the LBs and safeties need to do a better job in the middle of the field. 

---