Quote:Comparable talent level in what way? Arizona was not even ranked during the first meeting. For a long time it looked like ASU or UCLA was going to with the division. So I would be shocked if anyone compared the Wildcats and Ducks recently  because of their talent levels. But I pay no attention to the Pacific 12 and don't even know which city Arizona University is in, so I will learn a lot tonight. One thing I do know is when Rich Rodriguez was at Michigan, the Wolverines were terrible, especially on defense. So I am interested in seeing what is different at Arizona to make him succeed there with the 3-3-5 formation that was a complete failure at Michigan.

 

You know, people would probably not be as apt to rile you up and give you nicknames that you don't like if you didn't attack things that you don't even know about.

 

I understand that you have a very difficult time detecting subtlety and layered meanings, but to simply assume that something is wrong because you haven't heard information on it is really rather rude.

 

When I stated "somewhat comparable talent level" I meant in terms of contending teams, not necessarily exactly even talents. In fact, that's what "comparable" means. That two items, while one being greater than the other, can be compared.

 

Join the conversation, don't just start telling people things.

---