The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Devil's Advocate: Why Firing Bradley May not be the best thing
|
12-08-2014, 03:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-08-2014, 03:49 PM by jagfanthrutherottenyears.)
Quote:Gus likely still has 2 or 3 more losses coming to him this season.19 vs. 22? That's a difference of an extra 1.5 losses per season. 19 vs. 25 that's an extra 3 per season. There's a couple games this season that I can't put the blame on Gus for the loss (a blocked kick, for example), but that's a side issue. If multiple coaches can turn it around from just under 20 losses, it's not impossible, statistically or otherwise, to turn it around from 25. Quote:History isn't against him? I'm not saying it's absolutely impossible but of all currently employed NFL Head Coaches he would have to make the most drastic improvement following the worst 2 year start of anyone. I don't disagree with that (worst odds), but 3 of the worst 5 have won the Super Bowl. The only one of the top/worst 9 or 10 who would be an absolutely non-hire would be Ron Rivera. So the number of losses in the first two years does not really accurately predict head coaching failure. I don't think Khan will fire Bradley anytime soon and I don't think anyone will force Bradley to fire any of his staff. I do think if the team doesn't win at least 7 games next year, Khan or Caldwell will probably fire Bradley and his staff.
“It just shows what kind of team we are. We’re a tough team. We like contact. We’re very physical. We want the issue to be brought to us so we can show people we can stand up to it and overcome it. Seeing that’s just a symbol of our team and who we are.” - Jaguars DT Malik Jackson
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.