Quote:Not relevant to whether these are criminal actions or war acts.

 

 

I already covered that citizenship is irrelevant. Now you go ahead and cite the parts of the constitution that you conclude your first assertion here on.

Wrong again...The attacks on Embassies/Military Bases/American interests in foreign countries are defined as terrorist acts which fall under the catagory of enemy combatants...The world trade center plane bombing plan was designed by terrorists and intended to be a terrorist act. The hijackors entered the United States to commit a terrorist act so therefor it falls under the military tribunal prosecution...

 

Any event classified to be a terrorist act committed on the U.S. that occur either in or outside the United States can fall under the Military Tribunal prosecution UNLESS the person(s) committing the act are US Citizens such as with Timothy Mcvey and the Oaklahoma City bombing...

 

There has been no formal declaration of war therefor there is no such a thing as a war act in the case of prosecuting terrorist acts.

 

It's painfully clear that terrorist acts which are made on the United States and/or American interests, are done by Enemies of the United States, which classify them as Enemy Combatants. Enemy Combatants fall under Military prosecution which is called Military Tribunals...

 



enemy combatant


<div>
<div><span>noun </span>

<span>any member of the armed forces of a state with which another state is at war; also, </span>any
<span>person in an armed conflict, including terrorism, who could be properly detained under the laws and customs of war </span>

<div>Examples

<span>The
<span>term "enemy combatant" actually refers to persons the United States regards as unlawful combatants, a category of persons who do not qualify for prisoner-of-war status under the Geneva Conventions. </span></span>

</div>
</div>
</div>

---